Environment-Clean-Generations

Environment-Clean-Generations
THE DEFINITIVE BLOG FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT YOU LIVE IN, WITH REFERENCE TO LIFE, EARTH AND COSMIC SPACE SCIENCES, PRESENTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER DORU INDREI, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY SPACIALIST
"Life is not about what we know, but what we don't know, craving the unthinkable makes it so amazing, that is worth dying for." Doru Indrei
Custom Search
Showing posts with label gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gas. Show all posts

The Heart of Milky Way


Peer into the mysterious heart of our galaxy's centre. Typically obscured by gas and dust, the central Milky Way is revealed in this new image taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. The picture appears red because it was taken using infrared light, which can pierce through opaque dust clouds. The panoramic view captures a scene full of massive stars, complex structures and hot, ionised hydrogen gas.


Winds and radiation from giant stars carve out strange shapes in the gas and dust seen throughout the image. In the upper left, large arcs of ionised gas form ghostly filaments, indicating influence from strong galactic magnetic fields. The lower left shows pillars of gas sculpted by wind from the hot massive stars of the Quintuplet cluster.
The image also reveals populations of massive stars strewn throughout the central region. These glowing objects are anomalous because they are not confined to the central clusters where stars typically form: the Arches cluster, Central cluster and the Quintuplet cluster.

The newly discovered stars may have formed independently of these regions or they may have been thrown out of the main clusters by chaotic gravitational interactions.
In the lower right side of the image, ionised gas can be seen in a bright spiral surrounding the supermassive black hole at the galactic centre.
by "environment clean generations"

What Is Frozen Fuel?


All by itself, methane isn't very exciting. It's a colorless, odorless gas and the simplest member of the alkane series of hydrocarbons. Its biggest claim to fame is that, as the main constituent of natural gas, it's useful as a source of energy.

Recently, however, geologists have discovered a type of methane that has piqued their curiosity. Part of its unusual character is how it exists in its natural state -- trapped inside a cage of ice. Even more intriguing is how much of this frozen methane seems to be locked away in the Earth's crust. Some estimates indicate that as much as 700 quadrillion (700 × 1015) cubic feet (20 quadrillion cubic meters) of methane are encased in ice and trapped in seafloor sediments all over the world [source: Tarbuck]. That's twice as much carbon as Earth's other fossil fuels combined.

That's not just mud (pictured). It's mud containing methane hydrate, icelike crystals that form at low temperatures and high pressure. And it could be a future energy source. See more alternative fuel pictures.

The discovery of this new type of methane, what scientists call methane hydrate, has led to two important questions. The first is pragmatic: Will it burn like ordinary methane? It turns out it will. If you take a piece of methane hydrate -- it looks like hard-packed snow -- and touch a lighted match to it, the sample will burn with a reddish flame. And if that's the case, it could be used to heat homes, fuel cars and generally power energy-hungry nations such as Japan, the United States, India and China. Recent data suggest that just 1 percent of Earth's methane hydrate deposits could yield enough natural gas to meet America's energy needs for 170,000 years [source: Stone].

The second question is partly an ethical consideration: Should we, as a global community trying fervently to develop clean, renewable energy, embrace one of the fossil fuels that got us into trouble in the first place? Science can't answer that question. It can, however, reveal the challenges and risks that face countries hoping to take advantage of methane hydrate. One of the most significant challenges is finding efficient ways to extract the frozen fuel. More troubling are potential catastrophes -- ranging from massive underwater landslides to a runaway greenhouse effect -- related to methane mining.

In this article, we'll explore all the positives and negatives of methane hydrate. We'll look at its relatively brief history, as well as how it fits in some possible future scenarios. And, of course, we'll examine the basic science behind this so-called "flammable ice."


 Fire and Ice: The Chemistry of Methane Hydrate

Frozen fuel is the catchy name for a family of substances known as gas hydrates. The gas in question is natural gas, a mixture of hydrocarbons, such as methane, propane, butane and pentane. Of these, methane is by far the most common component and one of the most-studied compounds in chemistry.

Like all hydrocarbons, methane contains only two elements -- carbon and hydrogen. It is an example of a saturated hydrocarbon, or a molecule composed entirely of single bonds and therefore the maximum number of hydrogen atoms allowed. The general formula for saturated hydrocarbons is CnH2n+2. Methane only has one carbon atom, so its chemical formula is CH4. Chemists describe this shape as a tetrahedron.

Methane is a colorless, odorless, combustible gas produced by bacterial decomposition of plant and animal matter. It forms in a process shared by all fossil fuels. First, marine plants and animals die and fall to the seafloor. Next, mud and other seafloor sediments cover the decomposing organisms. The sediments put a great deal of pressure on the organic matter and begin to compress it. This compression, combined with high temperatures, breaks down the carbon bonds in the organic matter, transforming it into oil and natural gas.

Generally, this methane -- what geologists describe as "conventional" methane -- is located beneath the Earth's surface. To get to it, workers must drill through rock and sediment and tap into the methane deposits to release the gas. Then they pump it to the surface, where it's transported through pipes across the country.
Methane can also form unconventionally if the sediments producing it are located about 1,640 feet (500 meters) below the ocean surface.

The near-freezing temperatures and high pressure of these conditions causes the methane to become encased in ice. The methane doesn't bond chemically with the water. Instead, each tetrahedral methane molecule sits inside a crystalline shell made of ice. This unique substance is known as methane hydrate, and as soon as it reaches warmer temperatures and lower pressures, the ice melts away, leaving behind pure methane.
Geologists discovered naturally occurring methane hydrate only recently, but chemists have known about it for years.

A Brief History of Methane Hydrate

The history of gas hydrates can be traced back to Humphrey Davy, a chemist from Cornwall, England, who identified chlorine as an element in 1810.

Davy and his assistant, Michael Faraday, continued to work with chlorine throughout the early 1800s, mixing the green gas with water and cooling the mixture to low temperatures.

It's very likely that Davy observed the strange solid that resulted as chlorine atoms became encased in ice crystals, but Faraday gets official credit for the discovery. In 1823, Faraday issued a report describing the strange substance and called it chlorine clathrate hydrate. Other types of clathrates, each involving a guest compound locked inside the lattice structure of a host, were soon discovered, but they remained a laboratory curiosity.

Then, in the 1930s, natural-gas miners began to complain of an icelike material clogging pipelines exposed to cold temperatures. Scientists determined that this material was not pure ice, but ice wrapped around methane. They wasted no time trying to find ways to prevent hydrates from forming and turned primarily to chemicals, such as methanol or monoethylene glycol. Since then, mining companies have added these materials to their natural-gas pipelines to inhibit hydrate formation.

In the 1960s, scientists discovered that methane hydrate, or "solid natural gas," existed in the Messoyakha gas field in western Siberia. This was significant because naturally occurring gas hydrates had never been found before. Geologists and chemists arrived in the vast basin and began to study the conditions in which the hydrates were forming. They found that sub-permafrost sediments were rich in hydrates and began to look for similar deposits in other high-latitude regions. Soon, another team of researchers found methane hydrate in sediments buried deep below the North Slope of Alaska.

Based on these early findings, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory conducted extensive research between 1982 and 1992, revealing that methane hydrate deposits could be found in offshore sediments as well. Suddenly, what had once been a curiosity and an industrial nuisance looked like it might be a significant resource. In the mid-1990s, Japan and India took the lead in methane hydrate research, with the goal of finding more deposits and developing ways to extract the trapped methane economically. Scientists have since discovered methane hydrate deposits in numerous locations, including the Mackenzie River delta in Canada and the Nankai Trough off the coast of Japan.
Up next, we'll consider the impact methane hydrate could have on the world's energy supply.

 The Potential of Frozen Fuel

Once scientists began looking for methane hydrate deposits, they weren't disappointed. They found them beneath Arctic permafrost and  beneath the seafloor, especially in areas where one tectonic plate slides over another. These regions are known as subduction zones because the edge of one plate moves beneath another.

For example, off the coast of Washington and Oregon, the Juan de Fuca plate is sliding underneath the North American plate. Like a piece of wood being drawn across the blade of a plane, the sediments, including hydrates, of the Juan de Fuca plate are removed by the rocky crust of the North American plate. This creates a ridge of hydrates that runs parallel to the coast.

Hydrate deposits have also been found in regions where large ocean currents meet. Blake Ridge is a formation located off the coast of South Carolina, in water ranging from 6,562 to 15,748 feet (2,000 to 4,800 meters) deep. Geologists believe the ridge formed during the Oligocene epoch, about 33.7 to 23.8 million years ago.

The Greenland Sea opened up during this time, allowing huge amounts of cold, dense water to flow south along the Atlantic coast. As this cold water ran headlong into warm water being carried northward on the Gulf Stream, the currents slowed down and dropped large amounts of sediment. Organic material buried in these sediments eventually gave rise to a large amount of methane hydrate.

How much of this frozen fuel exists at Blake Ridge and other sites around the world? Some estimates put the amount of methane locked away in hydrates at anywhere from 100,000 trillion to 300,000,000 trillion cubic feet (2,832 trillion to 8,495,054 trillion cubic meters). Compare that to the 13,000 trillion cubic feet (368 trillion cubic meters) of conventional natural gas reserves remaining on the planet, and you can understand why jaws in the scientific community have dropped [source: Collett].
Of course, finding the hydrate deposits is one thing. As we'll see in the next section, getting them out -- and doing it safely -- is another thing entirely.

 The Risky Business of Mining Methane Hydrate

The potential rewards of releasing methane from gas hydrate fields must be balanced with the risks. And the risks are significant. Let's start first with challenges facing mining companies and their workers. Most methane hydrate deposits are located in seafloor sediments. That means drilling rigs must be able to reach down through more than 1,600 feet (500 meters) of water and then, because hydrates are generally located far underground, another several thousand feet before they can begin extraction. Hydrates also tend to form along the lower margins of continental slopes, where the seabed falls away from the relatively shallow shelf toward the abyss. The roughly sloping seafloor makes it difficult to run pipeline.

Even if you can situate a rig safely, methane hydrate is unstable once it's removed from the high pressures and low temperatures of the deep sea. Methane begins to escape even as it's being transported to the surface. Unless there's a way to prevent this leakage of natural gas, extraction won't be efficient. It will be a bit like hauling up well water using a pail riddled with holes.

Believe it or not, this leakage may be the least of the worries. Many geologists suspect that gas hydrates play an important role in stabilizing the seafloor. Drilling in these oceanic deposits could destabilize the seabed, causing vast swaths of sediment to slide for miles down the continental slope. Evidence suggests that such underwater landslides have occurred in the past (see sidebar), with devastating consequences. The movement of so much sediment would certainly trigger massive tsunamis similar to those seen in the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 2004.

But perhaps the biggest concern is how methane hydrate mining could affect global warming. Scientists already know that hydrate deposits naturally release small amounts of methane. The gas works itself skyward -- either bubbling up through permafrost or ocean water -- until it's released into the atmosphere. Once methane is in the atmosphere, it becomes a greenhouse gas even more efficient than carbon dioxide at trapping solar radiation. Some experts fear that drilling in hydrate deposits could cause catastrophic releases of methane that would greatly accelerate global warming.
Does that make methane from hydrate fields off-limits? This is the question scientists from all over the world are trying to answer.

The Future of Frozen Fuel

In 1997, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a research program that would ultimately allow commercial production of methane from gas hydrate deposits by 2015. Three years later, Congress authorized funding through the Methane Hydrate Research and Development Act of 2000. The Interagency Coordination Committee (ICC), a coalition of six government agencies, has been advancing research on several fronts. Much of what we know about the basic science of methane hydrate -- how it forms, where it forms and what role it plays, both in seafloor stabilization and global warming -- has come from the ICC's research.

Interesting ideas about how to extract the methane from hydrates efficiently are also emerging. Some experts propose a technique in which miners pump hot water down a drill hole to melt the hydrate and release the trapped methane. As the methane escapes, it is pumped to the seafloor through a companion drill hole.

From there, submarine pipelines carry the natural gas ashore. Unfortunately, such pipelines would need to travel over difficult underwater terrain. One solution is to build a production facility on the seafloor so it is situated near the hydrate deposits. As methane escapes from the heated sediments, workers in the plant would refreeze the gas to form "clean" methane hydrate. Submarines would then tow the frozen fuel in huge storage tanks to shallower waters, where the methane could be extracted and transported safely and efficiently.

Is all of this necessary? Won't renewable energy sources make it a waste of time to pursue another nonrenewable fossil fuel so vigorously? Realistically, fossil fuels will still be an important component of the world's overall energy mix for decades to come. According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), total U.S. natural gas consumption is expected to increase from about 22 trillion cubic feet (0.622 trillion cubic meters) today to about 27 trillion cubic feet (0.76 trillion cubic meters) in 2030. Global natural gas consumption is expected to increase to 182 trillion cubic feet (5.15 trillion cubic meters) over the same period [source: EIA]. Tapping into the methane locked away in hydrates will obviously play a key role in meeting that demand.

That means the frozen fuel from methane hydrate can buy more time as scientists search for alternatives to power our planet. Think of it as an important stepping-stone in our transition to cleaner, greener energy sources.

 by "environment clean generations"

Your Car With 0 Emissions WIth Hydrogen-Nanobead-Based Synthetic Gas

Cella Energy's Synthetic Gasoline Cella's CEO Stephen Voller shows off the goods; hydrogen microbeads go under the microscope.

We’re going to go ahead and write this one because it’s all kinds of interesting, but know that we are doing so with all kinds of skepticism, fair readers. Because anytime anyone claims to have created inexpensive synthetic fuel that will burn in conventional automobile engines with no carbon emissions, you simply have to be on your guard. Nonetheless, UK-based Cella Energy claims to have done exactly that by devising a hydrogen-based synthetic fuel that could replace gasoline in cars.


The technology—reportedly incubated at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory near Oxford in a top secret four-year program—is based on complex hydrides that are highly unstable, usually degrading rapidly in air. Put simply, the company claims it has found a nanotech-driven method that encapsulates hydrogen at usable concentrations in micro-capsules, allowing it to be handled and burned in conventional engines without the need to store it in dangerous high-pressure tanks or super-cooled environments. From Cella’s website:

Cella Energy have developed a method using a low-cost process called coaxial electrospinning or electrospraying that can trap a complex chemical hydride inside a nano-porous polymer that speeds up the kinetics of hydrogen desorption, reduces the temperature at which the desorption occurs and filters out many if not all of the damaging chemicals. It also protects the hydrides from oxygen and water, making it possible to handle it in air.

This means that basically the micro-capsules are stabilized hydrogen that moves like a fluid, meaning you could pump it into your automobile as-is, with no engine or fuel injection conversion—though Cella readily admits that preliminary deployment of their product would likely be as a fuel-additive that helps to cut down on carbon emissions.

Moreover, Gizmag writes that the fuel could be produced at a fixed price of about $1.50 per gallon, a price that would be stable and immune to the whims of OPEC or anyone else (except Cella, it seems). We’re not exactly sure where to attribute that dollar value, though Gizmag did interview the company’s CEO.

So: $1.50 per gallon carbon-free nano-liquid hydrogen fuel that burns in existing engines. Sound too good to be true? In theory the science makes sense assuming the “electrospinning” process works as well as Cella claims it does. But until those hydrogen micro-beads are powering our flying cars, we remain optimistically skeptical.


 by "environment clean generations"

Life In The Universe



                             Suppose now that somewhere, far, far away, there is a planet that harbors life. Could we somehow detect it? Could we read in the newspapers over the coming decades titles like: "Alien life was discovered"? 
                 The most obvious way to discover alien life would be sending a spatial probe, collecting samples from the planet chosen by us. Unfortunately this has a blemish way. With our tehnology we can do expeditions only in our solar system. We have some chance to discover life-forms on Mars, Titan or Europa. Expeditions that are underway or in the final phase of preparations will bring answers over a while. Of course, we are likely to find life in other places in the Solar System  too, but increasing the chance of discovering intelligent life ,we gotta get used to the idea to look in other star systems, to find life in the universe.

                No matter how optimistic should we be, we can not hope that we will very soon create those technologies that will allow us to get out and beyond our solar system. It is certain that will be made ​​once, when we better understand the fabric of space and time. Until then we should look for some ways that will allow us from here, from Earth, to identify those planets where life evolved. 
It may seem surprising to many of you, but this search has already begun, by identifying the first extrasolar planets, to find life in the universe.
               This discovery allowed us to say that planetary systems are not rare events in the universe. Followed, in November 2001, announcing an epochal discovery: it was first discovered an extrasolar planet with atmosphere. It's planet HD 209458, the discovery was detailed in Science and Technology 1/2-2002. Moreover, a brief analysis could be made of the composition of the atmosphere. Could this kind of discovery help to identify distant life-planets? And life in the universe?

               Two important missions, one organized by NASA, with it's Kepler Space Telescope and the other by ESA, is about Darwin Space Telescope.The NASA spacecraft was launched on March 7, 2009 with a planned mission lifetime of at least 3.5 years, designed to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars. Here is a very important step in detection of extraterrestrial life



   
            First, the mere discovery of such a planet, to a right distance from the right star, could easily tell us the possibility that there life could be sheltered. But to science this is not enough. Evidence is needed. If there is life on a planet, the atmosphere should signal its presence. Even the air you exhale, the moment you read this article, gives us information on your presence. It contains more carbon dioxide than in the normal atmosphere. We know that someone is the room, by simply analyzing the air in the given room.
           We could tell if there are "creatures" by changes that are made in air composition inside. 

                We can also undertake research on a planetary scale, in the hope that we can find signs of life on a certain planet. But in such a situation, things are complicated. As a fact, the only possible form of life is based on liquid water and carbon. It is possible that this is a limitation of the scientific imagination (which, unlike other kinds of "imagination", needs a solid base).  

               We, scientists, have few limitations in this regard and therefore we can say that there might be other life-forms that have no connection with what we know so far.Life in the universe out there can be very bizarre.
               But we can not go too far, because we can not remove too much of what we know. We added this paragraph a statement that belongs to a scientist at NASA. David Des Marais is a researcher at Ames Research Center, said that "we must consider to what extent alien biology might be different from ours, especially when it comes to macromolecules." (This is why silicon-based life could be taken into account although, in this grouping, have made ​​strong arguments against it.)
               Let us return for a short while to the example that I gave earlier. Say that we can identify the presence of people in a room just by analyzing the composition of air inside. A supplement of CO2 would be sufficient and satisfactory proof. A similar path should follow when looking for signs of life in the universe on other planets. We depart from the assumption that living organisms possess a metabolism. Simplified speaking, they take certain substances from the environment and eliminate others. The utmost importance, is the presence of the oxygen. When referring to an extrasolar planet, will have to consider an entire atmosphere, not a small area of it. Therefore the oxygen would be the best indicator of life. It is a highly reactive element which quickly combines with existing chemical elements on the surface or in the planet's atmosphere. 


             Free oxygen can not survive long in the atmosphere of a planet, as long as it is not generated by a geological or biological process. The same thing we can say for terrestrial oxygen. It is the result of metabolic processes during photosynthesis, or, if you will, it is the result of "pollution" from the plants. Carl Sagan noted in 1997 that "high concentration of oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere could be very difficult to explain in the absence of life." 



               Here is the first criterion that could help to identify the existence of life in the universe on a distant planet, thousands of light years from Earth. Sure, now I have to tell you how to identify the oxygen in the atmosphere of a distant planet. Principle is not complicated and was already used to detect extrasolar planets with atmosphere, as was the case of HD 2094. 
              Practical we only have to follow the spectrum of the target star, seeking dark lines that are specific elements that absorb light of the star on certain frequencies. We make this observation for long periods, carefully watching the periodic appearance and disappearance of additional lines, it indicate a planet passing in front of the star disc. These lines indicates the presence of a planet periodically passing in front of the star.

   
             In the next stage will see whose elements correspond to absorption lines. If we identify the oxygen, we can move forward. We will make more precise measurements , we determine the mass and distance of the planet from the central star. If the values ​​obtained will overlap with those considered by us to be favorable for life, than we can announce the newspapers that (probably) we have discovered a planet that harbors life.
            Perhaps you don't like our eternal distressing uncertainty, our repeated lack of safety. So is science. Additional evidence is needed to confirm their initial ones.

            Where can we find them? If we can not go fast on the planet assumed to be a shelter for life, we call the same method indicated above. We will look more carefully in search of another gas that should not be there. The gas that we refer now is already an indication as to the existence of life on a celestial body, apparently close to our eyes, it's Mars.  


             Mars Express Probe has detected traces of methane in the Martian atmosphere, which could have indicate the existence of primitive life-forms on the Red Planet. Why would methane gas be an indicator for life? In fact it is not as chemically reactive as oxygen and, therefore, could survive long and hard in an atmosphere that was generated by the biochemical pathways. Methane is not very reactive. But methane has another interesting property for us: it is unstable. Its chemical bonds break easily under the action of cosmic radiation, so it will decompose quickly enough (for Mars let's say 400,000 years)
            To continue our demonstration about life in the universe, we will add that methane is an important metabolic product resulting from metabolism of certain bacteria that break down dead organisms .
That is why, the very moment we find, simultaneously, the atmosphere of extrasolar planets, both oxygen and methane, as we move from "very likely" to "almost certainly" when will communicate to world the news "life on another planet found". 
            Recent discoveries brought in full light a lot of planets that have atmosphere and even liquid water, but their distances ranging between 40 and 200 ly and even more, and right now this is a problem for us. 
           Furthermore, the future? The future is as exciting as it gets. It takes by surprising in a good way, especially when it comes to science. Life in the universe will eventually emerge. But the precise location, we can't tell yet. However, whenever the event will occur, we must prepare our minds to accept things that right now comes with the word "unimaginable"...





            by "environment clean generations"

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Search

Custom Search

 
Design by Wordpress Theme | Bloggerized by Free Blogger Templates | coupon codes