Environment Clean Generations: radiation

Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts

Two Poles Two Holes; 5 Reasons You Should Care About the New Ozone Hole Over the Arctic

A prolonged chill in the atmosphere high above the Arctic last winter led to a mobile, morphing hole in the ozone layer, scientists report in a new paper. It’s just like the South Pole hole we all studied in school, but potentially more harmful to humans — more of us live at northern latitudes. Here are five things you need to know about it.

These top two maps show total ozone, and the bottom show ozone deficit. The Arctic is in the left column and the Antarctic on the right

1: THIS IS A NEW PROBLEM

Most of the public probably knows about the infamous ozone hole over the South Pole, which became one of the great environmental recovery efforts of the 1980s. The Arctic loses some ozone every year, too, but not like this, said Gloria Manney, who works at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in Socorro.

“No previous year rivals 2011, when the evolution of Arctic ozone more closely followed that typical of the Antarctic,” Manney and colleagues write in the Oct. 2 online issue of Nature. For the first time, the Arctic loss was enough to be considered a hole.

Both holes are driven by chemical reactions involving chlorine. In cold air and sunlight, chlorine is converted into compounds that break down ozone (itself a harmful substance at the surface, but a protective one at stratospheric altitudes). Antarctica experiences an annual ozone hole as a result. The Arctic is cold, too, but usually not as cold as the Antarctic, and not for as long. But winter 2010-2011 was different. Scientists aren’t sure why.

“The processes that control temperatures in the stratosphere in the winter are so complex; it depends on various factors,” Manney said in an interview. “In December, we couldn’t have told you we were going to have this unusually long cold period.”

2: IT COULD HAPPEN AGAIN

Without ozone, more radiation would get through to interfere with our DNA, and that of other life forms on Earth.The planet’s climate is an extremely complex system, so it’s hard to say what will happen if global surface temperatures rise as expected. But it’s generally accepted that an increase in surface temperatures will translate to a chill in the upper atmosphere, Manney said. So as the Arctic loses more of its ice sheet in the summer, the air will get even colder up above, meaning more of the chlorine reactions will take place.

“If the stratosphere cools as a result of the changing climate, we might see severe ozone depletion more often in the future,” she said.

3: IT'S TOO LATE TO STOP

Humans have already emitted enough chemicals to seed the process. The Montreal Protocol, which took effect in 1989, prohibits production of chemicals involved in ozone destruction. But human activity belched out plenty of those chemicals before international governments ever started noticing, let alone signing treaties. There’s still enough in the atmosphere for this effect to persist for decades, Manney said.

4: PEOPLE NEED OZONE

The air over the Arctic is extremely mobile and turbulent, forming a vortex that covers the entire region. It’s a massive area, equivalent to maybe five Californias, and it churns and moves about the Arctic Circle. In April 2011, the vortex — and the hole — moved over northern Russia and Mongolia, Manney said. The climate-monitoring scientists didn’t notice it at the time, but ground-level ultraviolet radiation monitors started to spike.

The ozone layer’s main utility is in protecting Earth from the sun’s UV rays. Without ozone, more radiation would get through to interfere with our DNA, and that of other life forms on Earth. A mobile ozone hole in the northern latitudes thus poses a risk to lots of people.

5: WE NEED MORE DATA

International groups of scientists monitor the Arctic with a suite of Earth-observing satellites, balloons, ground stations and more. But some of their instruments, especially the satellites, are not designed to last for much longer. The instruments onboard NASA’s Aura spacecraft, whose trace gas and cloud measurements were key to this study, were designed to last about 5 years and they’re now about 7, Manney said.

And as we’ve seen before, it’s tough to get a polar-observing satellite approved.

“There aren’t immediate plans for other satellites that give us the same kind of comprehensive measurements. So it is a concern as to whether and how much capability we’ll have to monitor not just ozone, but the other chemicals that contribute to destroying ozone,” Manney said.

... AND NOW FOR SOME GOOD NEWS

Combating greenhouse gas emissions and reversing global warming will help — if surface temps don’t rise dramatically, the stratosphere may not cool dramatically, and the chemical reactions that cause ozone depletion may not occur over the Arctic. What's more, humans have already made some progress with the Montreal Protocol, Manney said.

“Having done that, we expect that we are now on a path to where eventually, in several decades, we will stop having enough chlorine to form ozone holes,” she said. “And things we might be able to do to mitigate climate change would also decrease our odds of seeing more severe future ozone loss.”

As a scientist, Manney wouldn’t speculate about other possible solutions — like geoengineering or cloud-seeding projects that would warm up the stratosphere and prevent more ozone depletion, which we'll just go ahead and throw out there. But she does believe with better data and better models, she and others will eventually be able to predict where and when it happens, leading to better warning systems for people on the ground.

“There is the possibility of saying, ‘We’ve had severe ozone loss this winter, and the ozone vortex is expected to be here [in Russia or elsewhere], so you guys should put your sunscreen on,'” she said.

by "environment clean generations"

Keep Reading...

Posted in: arctic hole,arctic ozone hole,chlorine,environment,greenhouse gas emissions,holes,ozone,ozone vortex,poles,radiation

Deciphering The Earth, A Brief Review

n "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," Arthur Dent has trouble getting his mind around the Vogon Constructor Fleet's destruction of the Earth. He can't process it -- it's just too big. Arthur tries to narrow it down, but thinking of England, New York, Bogart movies and the dollar produces no reaction. Only when he considers the extinction of McDonald's hamburgers does it finally sink in.

After deciding to write about how the Earth works, we felt a little like Arthur Dent. Even though it's tiny compared to the rest of the universe, the Earth is enormous, and it's extremely complex.

But instead of collectively going out for a burger, we decided to take another approach. Rather than examining each of the Earth's parts, we'll look at what ties it all together. Just about everything on Earth happens because of the presence of the sun.

Power and light

Compared to the rest of the universe, the Earth is very small. Our planet and eight (or maybe nine) others orbit the sun, which is only one of about 200 billion stars in our galaxy. Our galaxy, the Milky Way, is part of the universe, which includes millions of other galaxies and their stars and planets. By comparison, the Earth is microscopic.

Compared to a person, on the other hand, the Earth is enormous. It has a diameter of 7,926 miles (12,756 kilometers) at the equator, and it has a mass of about 6 x 10²⁴ kilograms. The Earth orbits the sun at a speed of about 66,638 miles per hour (29.79 kilometers per second). Don't dwell on those numbers too long, though; to a lot of people, the Earth is inconceivably, mind-bogglingly big. And it's just a fraction of the size of the sun.

From our perspective on Earth, the sun looks very small. This is because it's about 93 million miles away from us. The sun's diameter at its equator is about 100 times bigger than Earth's, and about a million Earths could fit inside the sun. The sun is inconceivably, mind-bogglingly bigger.

But without the sun, the Earth could not exist. In a sense, the Earth is a giant machine, full of moving parts and complex systems. All those systems need power, and that power comes from the sun.

The sun is an enormous nuclear power source -- through complex reactions, it transforms hydrogen into helium, releasing light and heat. Because of these reactions, every square meter of our planet's surface gets about 342 Watts of energy from the sun every year. This is about 1.7 x 10¹⁷ Watts total, or as much as 1.7 billion large power plants could generate [source: NASA]. You can learn about how the sun creates energy in How the Sun Works.

When this energy reaches the Earth, it provides power for a variety of reactions, cycles and systems. It drives the circulation of the atmosphere and the oceans. It makes food for plants, which many people and animals eat. Life on Earth could not exist without the sun, and the planet itself would not have developed without it.

To a casual observer, the sun's most visible contributions to life are light, heat and weather. Now we'll look at how the sun powers each of those.

Night and day

Some of the sun's biggest impacts on our planet are also its most obvious. As the Earth spins on its axis, parts of the planet are in the sun while others are in the shade. In other words, the sun appears to rise and set. The parts of the world that are in daylight get warmer while the parts that are dark gradually lose the heat they absorbed during the day.

You can get a sense of how much the sun affects the Earth's temperature by standing outside on a partly cloudy day. When the sun is behind a cloud, you feel noticeably cooler than when it isn't. The surface of our planet absorbs this heat from the sun and emits it the same way that pavement continues to give off heat in the summer after the sun goes down. Our atmosphere does the same thing -- it absorbs the heat that the ground emits and sends some of it back to the Earth.

The Earth's relationship with the sun also creates seasons. The Earth's axis tips a little -- about 23.5 degrees. One hemisphere points toward the sun as the other points away. The hemisphere that points toward the sun is warmer and gets more light -- it's summer there, and in the other hemisphere it's winter. This effect is less dramatic near the equator than at the poles, since the equator receives about the same amount of sunlight all year. The poles, on the other hand, receive no sunlight at all during their winter months, which is part of the reason why they're frozen.

Most people are so used to the differences between night and day (or summer and winter) that they take them for granted. But these changes in light and temperature have an enormous impact on other systems on our planet. One is the circulation of air through our atmosphere. For example:

The sun shines brightly over the equator. The air gets very warm because the equator faces the sun directly and because the ozone layer is thinner there.
As the air warms, it begins to rise, creating a low pressure system. The higher it rises, the more the air cools. Water condenses as the air cools, creating clouds and rainfall. The air dries out as the rain falls. The result is warm, dry air, relatively high in our atmosphere.
Because of the lower air pressure, air rushes toward the equator from the north and south. As it warms, it rises, pushing the dry air away to the north and the south.
The dry air sinks as it cools, creating high-pressure areas and deserts to the north and south of the equator.

This is just one piece of how the sun circulates air around the world -- ocean currents, weather patterns and other factors also play a part. But in general air moves from high-pressure to low-pressure areas, much the way that high-pressure air rushes from the mouth of an inflated balloon when you let go. Heat also generally moves from the warmer equator to the cooler poles.

Imagine a warm drink sitting on your desk -- the air around the drink gets warmer as the drink gets colder. This happens on Earth on an enormous scale.

The Coriolis Effect, a product of the Earth's rotation, affects this system as well. It causes large weather systems, like hurricanes, to rotate. It helps create westward-running trade winds near the equator and eastward-running jet streams in the northern and southern hemispheres. These wind patterns move moisture and air from one place to another, creating weather patterns. (The Coriolis Effect works on a large scale -- it doesn't really affect the water draining from the sink like some people suppose.)

The sun gets much of the credit for creating both wind and rain. When the sun warms air in a specific location, that air rises, creating an area of low pressure. More air rushes in from surrounding areas to fill the void, creating wind. Without the sun, there wouldn't be wind. There also might not be breathable air at all.

Sun and Moon

The sun has a relationship with the moon, too. The light we see when the moon shines at night is really reflected light from the sun. The relative positions of the sun and moon also create solar and lunar eclipses. This might make it seem like the moon is nothing without the sun, but it does some important jobs for the Earth. The moon regulates the Earth's orbit, and it causes the ocean tides.

Sugar and carbon

The Earth's atmosphere is mostly composed of nitrogen. Oxygen makes up just 21 percent of the air we breathe. Carbon dioxide, argon, ozone, water vapor and other gasses make up a tiny portion of it, as little as 1 percent. These gasses probably came from several processes as the Earth evolved and grew as a planet.

But some scientists believe that the Earth's atmosphere would never have contained the oxygen we need without plants. Plants (and some bacteria) release oxygen during photosynthesis, the process they use to change water and carbon dioxide into sugar they can use for food.

Photosynthesis is a complex reaction. In a lot of ways, it's similar to the way your body breaks down food into fuel that it can store. Essentially, using energy from the sun, a plant can transform carbon dioxide and water into glucose and oxygen. In chemical terms:
6CO₂ + 12H₂O + Light -> C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂+ 6H₂O

In other words, while we inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide, plants inhale carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen. Some scientists believe that our atmosphere had little to no oxygen before plants evolved and started releasing it.

Without the sun to feed plants (and the plants to release oxygen), we might not have breathable air. Without plants to feed us and the animals most people use for food, we'd also have nothing to eat.
Obviously, plants are important, but not just because they give us food to eat and oxygen to breathe. Plants help control the amount of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, in the atmosphere.

They protect the soil from wind and from water runoff, helping to control erosion. In addition, they release water into the air during photosynthesis. This water, along with the rest of the water on the planet, takes part in a huge cycle that the sun controls

The Carbon Cycle

Carbon is fundamental to life -- all organic forms of life contain it. On Earth, carbon cycles through the atmosphere and the planet itself. This cycle has two components. The geological component involves carbon-containing compounds eroding from the land, washing into the sea, entering the Earth's mantle layer and being expelled through volcanoes. The biological component involves plants' and animals' inspiration and expiration. Since carbon is a greenhouse gas, its presence affects how warm or cool the planet is. The NASA Earth Observatory has a thorough explanation of the carbon cycle.

Water and fire

The sun has a huge effect on our water. It warms the oceans around the tropics, and its absence cools the water around the poles. Because of this, ocean currents move large amounts of warm and cold water, drastically affecting the weather and climate around the world. The sun also drives the water cycle, which moves about 18,757 cubic miles (495,000 cubic kilometers) of water vapor through the atmosphere every yea.

If you've ever gotten out of a swimming pool on a hot day and realized a few minutes later that you were dry again, you have firsthand experience with evaporation. If you've seen water form on the side of a cold drink, you've seen condensation in action. These are primary components of the water cycle, also called the hydrologic cycle, which exchanges moisture between bodies of water and land masses. The water cycle is responsible for clouds and rain as well as our supply of drinking water.
Here's what happens:

The sun shines on the surface of oceans and lakes, exciting molecules of water. The more the sun excites the molecules, the faster they move, or evaporate.
The molecules rise through the atmosphere as water vapor. Plants add to this water vapor through transpiration, a byproduct of photosynthesis, which also depends on the sun. In some locations, water sublimates, or changes directly from ice to vapor.
All of this water vapor rises into the atmosphere. The higher it rises, the cooler it gets. The molecules of water slow down and stick together, or condense, as they cool. This forms clouds. Depending on how high and thick they are, clouds can either warm or cool the surface of the planet under them.
Droplets continue to combine inside the clouds. When they get big and heavy enough, they fall as precipitation. (Pollution in clouds can decrease the amount of rainfall by requiring droplets to be bigger and heavier before they can fall.)
Precipitation falls as rain, snow, sleet or hail, depending on the temperature and other conditions. Over land, it falls onto the ground and into rivers and lakes. Some of the water seeps into the soil, nourishing plants and joining the groundwater. Much of it flows into rivers and lakes, which eventually run into the ocean.

Without the sun to start the process of evaporation, the water cycle wouldn't exist. We wouldn't have clouds, rain or weather. The water on the planet would be stagnant. It would also be solid, since without the sun to warm it, the Earth would be entirely frozen.

The sun powers the processes that control our climate and the content of our atmosphere. Without it, we wouldn't have oxygen or liquid water on our planet. We wouldn't have weather or seasons. But the sun's immense source of power also has some drawbacks. Next, we'll look at some of phenomena that protect Earth from the power of the sun.

The Earth's Atmosphere

Some people imagine the Earth's atmosphere as a blanket of air that gets thinner and colder the higher you go. While the atmosphere does tend to get thinner, it's made of distinct regions, and some outer layers are much hotter than our planet's surface. NASA has a great description of the layers of the atmosphere with links to images of each.

Heat and wind

The sun's massive power source has two main disadvantages -- ultraviolet light and the solar wind. Ultraviolet light can cause cancer, cataracts and other health problems. The solar wind, a stream of charged, or ionized, particles that stream off of the sun, could strip away our atmosphere. Fortunately, the Earth has some natural defenses against both. Our ozone layer protects us from ultraviolet (UV) light, and our magnetic field protects us from the solar wind.

The stratosphere, the layer of atmosphere just above the one in which we live, contains a thin layer of ozone (O3). This layer wouldn't exist without the sun. Ozone is made of three atoms of oxygen. It's not a very stable molecule, but it takes a lot of power to create it. When UV light hits a molecule of oxygen (O2) of, it splits it into two atoms of oxygen (O).

When one of these atoms comes into contact with a molecule of oxygen, they combine to make ozone. The process also works in reverse -- when UV light hits ozone, it splits it into a molecule of oxygen and an atom of oxygen.

This process is called the ozone-oxygen cycle, and it converts UV light into heat, preventing it from reaching the surface of the Earth. Without the sun, the Earth wouldn't have an ozone layer -- but without the sun, the Earth also wouldn't need it.

Oxygen molecule + light = two atoms of oxygen. Oxygen atom + oxygen molecule = ozone molecule.

But while the sun creates the ozone layer, the Earth itself creates its defense against the solar wind. Without the Earth's magnetic field, ionized particles from the solar wind could strip the planet's atmosphere away. This magnetic field comes from deep inside the Earth's core. Interactions between the inner and outer core create the magnetic field.

The planet's inner core is made of solid iron. Surrounding the inner core is a molten outer core. These two layers are very deep within the Earth, separated from its crust by the thick mantle. The mantle is solid but malleable, like plastic, and it's the source of the magma that comes from volcanoes .

The Earth's inner core spins, much like the Earth spins on its axis. The outer core spins as well, and it spins at a different rate than the inner core. This creates a dynamo effect, or convections and currents within the core. This is what creates the Earth's magnetic field -- it's like a giant electromagnet. When the solar wind reaches the Earth, it collides with the magnetic field, or magnetosphere, rather than with the atmosphere.

The poles actually change places periodically -- about 400 times in the last 330 million years. The field weakens while the shift takes place. But computer simulations predict that the sun might come to the rescue, interacting with the atmosphere to supplement the magnetic field, while the shift is in process.
The Earth's physical composition generates its magnetic field. That composition is a product of the Earth's creation, which would not have been possible without the sun.

Image courtesy SOHO Consortium. SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA.

How Do We Know?

As with evolution, the Big Bang Theory has caused some controversy. Here are a few of the reasons scientists think it's accurate:

All of the matter in the universe is moving away from all the other matter at a very fast rate. Scientists have proven this by measuring stars' Hubble red shift, or how light waves get stretched out as they rush away from us.
Scientists can detect and measure low-level radiation called cosmic microwave background (CMB) or primordial background radiation. This seems to be an aftereffect of the Big Bang. New analysis of the CMB suggests that the universe changed from a microscopic point to an enormous system in a fraction of a second

Planets and stars

The most prominent scientific theory about the origin of the Earth involves a spinning cloud of dust called a solar nebula. This nebula is a product of the Big Bang. Philosophers, religious scholars and scientists have lots of ideas about where the universe came from, but the most widely-held scientific theory is the Big Bang Theory. According to this theory, the universe originated in an enormous explosion.

Before the Big Bang, all of the matter and energy now in the universe was contained in a singularity. A singularity is a point with an extremely high temperature and infinite density. It's also what's found at the center of a black hole. This singularity floated in a complete vacuum until it exploded, flinging gas and energy in all directions. Imagine a bomb going off inside an egg -- matter moved in all directions at high speeds.

As the gas from the explosion cooled, various physical forces caused particles to stick together. As they continued to cool, they slowed down and became more organized, eventually growing into stars. This process took about a billion years.

About five billion years ago, some of this gas and matter became our sun. At first, it was a hot, spinning cloud of gas that also included heavier elements. As the cloud spun, it collected into a disc called a solar nebula. Our planet and others probably formed inside this disc. The center of the cloud continued to condense, eventually igniting and becoming a sun.

There's no concrete evidence for exactly how the Earth formed within this nebula. Scientists have two main theories. Both involve accretion, or the sticking together of molecules and particles. They have the same basic idea -- about 4.6 billion years ago, the Earth formed as particles collected within a giant disc of gas orbiting what would become our sun. Once the sun ignited, it blew all of the extra particles away, leaving the solar system as we know it. Our moon formed in the solar nebula as well.

At first, the Earth was very hot and volcanic. A solid crust formed as the planet cooled, and impacts from asteroids and other debris caused lots of craters. As the planet continued to cool, water filled the basins that had formed in the surface, creating oceans.

Through earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and other factors, the Earth's surface eventually reached the shape that we know today. Its mass provides the gravity that holds everything together and its surface provides a place for us to live. But the whole process would not have started without the sun.

by"environment clean generations"

Keep Reading...

Posted in: atmosphere,coriolis effect,Deciphering The Earth A Brief Review,earth,food,hubble,inner core,nasa,oxygen,ozone,radiation,stars,sun,ultraviolet,volcanic eruptions,water,wind

Attention, Supervillains and Climate Engineers

Of all of C. Montgomery Burns’s nefarious dealings on The Simpsons, perhaps none sticks in the public consciousness like the time he attempted to use a massive shade to block out the sun (most notably because doing so led to his being shot by a vigilante baby and an uncharacteristic two-episode event). But the U.N. may soon put all such plans to blot out the sun – villainous or otherwise – on hold.

The U.N. convention could choose to take up this topic – no joke – during the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity going on until the end of this month in Nagoya, Japan. It might sound a bit sci-fi, but some in the scientific community have advocated reducing the amount of sunlight reaching earth to slow the effects of global warming.

Doing so requires launching some kind of medium into space to deflect the suns rays. Some schemes call for placing a large lens or something like it out at the Lagrange point between Earth and the sun to deflect a small percentage of the sun’s radiation away. Others call for placing many billions or trillions of tiny objects between us and the sun. All are estimated to be very expensive and it’s not at all certain that any of these ideas would work. But they have been seriously considered; even NASA and other reputable space organizations have looked at the idea, even if only to keep an open mind.

But the U.N.’s interest stems from the fact that if it’s unclear whether a shading scheme would even be effective, it’s even more unclear what the ramifications would be if one was. Such an experiment could have unforeseen effects on climate and ecosystems back on Earth, and that could cause problems ranging from drought and famine to extreme weather systems or even, in extreme cases, extinction of some species (hopefully not us).

Regardless, it appears the U.N. aims to look into banning sunshades or at least limit research into them, choosing instead to face the global warming crisis with solutions here on Earth. Bond villains and unscrupulous cartoon energy magnates, take note.

Keep Reading...

Posted in: engineers,nasa,radiation,space,sun

Can You Split Uranium Atoms In Your Kitchen?

A Swedish gentleman, citing a a curiosity about whether or not it’s possible to split atoms in one’s own home, has been arrested for trying to induce fission of radium, americium, and uranium in his kitchen. No joke.

Now, lest the Swedes get a bad name for running an over-protective state, it’s important to note here that Richard Handl was not arrested for being a scientific pioneer, but for being in possession of highly controlled radioactive materials, one of which has previously been used to destroy entire cities.

And in Handl’s defense--as he is now more or less my new personal hero--the 31-year-old turned himself in. Or rather, after catalyzing a “small meltdown” on his stove he wrote an inquiry to the Swedish Radiation Authority asking if his activities were, strictly speaking, legal.

There’s no telling what the clerk at the Radiation Authority thought as he or she opened and read that letter, but what happened next is clear: the police stopped by to take a look at Handl's "lab." Though they did not detect any dangerous levels of radiation in Handl’s apartment, they did arrest him.

He faces fines and/or possibly up to two years behind bars. And though time served won’t stop Handl from chasing big ideas, he told police he’ll think better of such projects in the future, telling the AP “from now on, I will stick to the theory.”

by "environment clean generation"

Keep Reading...

Posted in: kitchen,radiation,uranium

Radiation Hot Spots At Fukushima

In the last two days, workers monitoring radiation levels at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have detected “hot spot” areas on the site, where pockets of air contain such high doses that standing in those spots for an hour would result in acute poisoning and likely lead to death within weeks.

Thankfully, the workers who detected the danger zones where radiation exceeded 10 sieverts per hour, did so quickly.

"Three plant workers were exposed to a dosage of four millisieverts while they were monitoring radiation," a Tokyo Electric Power Company spokeswoman told AFP. "We are still checking the cause of such high levels of radioactivity." Four millisieverts is the typical background radiation most people living in a city receive in a year.

A handout from TEPCO, distributed through Reuters, shows a gamma ray image of the location of where the workers detected the first known hot spot: at the base of a ventilation shaft between the power plant’s No. 1 and No. 2 reactors. TEPCO reported measurements of over 10 sieverts (10,000 millisieverts) per hour at the base of the vent on Monday afternoon. On Wednesday TEPCO announced another site, on the floor inside reactor No. 1, had been found with 5 sieverts (5,000 millisieverts) of radiation per hour, the Associated Press reported.

Until this week the highest readings at the site had been on the order of 2 sieverts (2,000 millisieverts) per hour or less.

TEPCO, says that the areas are restricted and have been cordoned off. They are currently considering shielding as a countermeasure.

Nuclear engineer Gary Was of the University of Michigan told CNN that the gamma-ray camera should help identify if radioactivity resulted from reactor waste products, bits of nuclear fuel or both. He suggested that the location of the hot spot at the base of the emergency ventilation shaft makes it likely that the radioactive material came from air and steam released to relieve pressure inside the reactors during the meltdowns and channeled through the air system filters.

IMAGE 1: Gamma-ray imagery showing the bottom of a ventilation stack standing between Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant's No. 1 and No. 2 reactors, where radiation exceeding 10 sieverts (10,000 millisieverts) per hour was found as shown in red. (Courtesy of Yoshikazu Nagai, TEPCO)

IMAGE 2: Map of the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (TEPCO).

IMAGE 3: Map from the status report of the radiation dose measured on Aug 3, 2011 at 9 pm local time (TEPCO).

IMAGE 4: The troubled Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant off the coast of Japan as seen from south of the plant.

by "environment clean generations"

Keep Reading...

Posted in: hot spots,kufushima,radiation

What is an electron volt?

An electron volt, or eV for short, is a measure of energy. It is quite a small amount of energy similar to the amount of energy possessed by a single photon of light. Other forms of radiation have much more energy. On this web-site energies are often quoted in scientific notation. For example 10⁶ eV (electron volts) is equal to 1,000,000 eV. i.e. 1 with 6 zeroes after it. In another example 3x10⁹ eV would be equal to 3 with 9 zeroes after it or 3,000,000,000 electron volts.

Here are some examples of radiation of different energies.

Radiation	Energy
Photon of light Can be detected by your eye	1 eV
Ultra Violet ray from sun Enough to burn your skin	10 eV
X-Ray Can pass right through your body	1000 eV = 1 keV
Gamma ray detected by the Whipple group's telescope	10¹² eV = 1 TeV
Cosmic Ray detected by the SPASE-2 experiment	10¹⁵ eV = 1 PeV
Cosmic Ray detected by the planned Pierre Auger Observatory	10²⁰ eV = 100 EeV
Highest energy Cosmic Ray ever recorded	3x10²⁰ eV This is the amount of energy that you would feel if you dropped a bowling ball on your foot from a height of 1 metre!

We have some other shorthand notation for electron volt described below.

Energy	Shorthand
10³ eV = 1,000 eV	Kev = Kilo electron volt
10⁶ eV = 1,000,000 eV	MeV = Mega electron volt
10⁹ eV = 1,000,000,000 eV	GeV =Giga electron volt
10¹² eV = 1,000,000,000,000 eV	TeV = Terra electron volt
10¹⁵ eV = 1,000,000,000,000,000 eV	PeV = Peta electron volt
10¹⁸ eV = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 eV	EeV = Exa electron volt
10²¹ eV = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 eV	ZeV = Zeta electron volt

by environment clean generations

Keep Reading...

Posted in: electron,energy,physics,radiation

Environment Clean Generations