Environment-Clean-Generations

Environment-Clean-Generations
THE DEFINITIVE BLOG FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT YOU LIVE IN, WITH REFERENCE TO LIFE, EARTH AND COSMIC SPACE SCIENCES, PRESENTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER DORU INDREI, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY SPACIALIST
"Life is not about what we know, but what we don't know, craving the unthinkable makes it so amazing, that is worth dying for." Doru Indrei
Custom Search
Showing posts with label mass. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mass. Show all posts

World's Sixth Mass Extinction May Be Soon


A western lowland gorilla resting against tree. The gorilla, like many other animals today, is endangered. Over the past 540 million years, there have been five mega extinction events. Mankind may be causing a sixth due to habitat loss, over-hunting, over-fishing and the spread of germs. Until human populations expanded, mammal extinctions were very rare.

Mankind may have unleashed the sixth known mass extinction in Earth's history, according to a paper released on Wednesday by the science journal Nature.
Over the past 540 million years, five mega-wipeouts of species have occurred through naturally-induced events.


But the new threat is man-made, inflicted by habitation loss, over-hunting, over-fishing, the spread of germs and viruses and introduced species, and by climate change caused by fossil-fuel greenhouse gases, says the study.
Evidence from fossils suggests that in the "Big Five" extinctions, at least 75 percent of all animal species were destroyed. Palaeobiologists at the University of California at Berkeley looked at the state of biodiversity today, using the world's mammal species as a barometer.

"It looks like modern extinction rates resemble mass extinction rates, even after setting a high bar for defining 'mass extinction," said researcher Anthony Barnosky.

This picture is supported by the outlook for mammals in the "critically endangered" and "currently threatened" categories of the Red List of biodiversity compiled by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).


On the assumption that these species are wiped out and biodiversity loss continues unchecked, "the sixth mass extinction could arrive within as little as three to 22 centuries," said Barnosky.

Compared with nearly all the previous extinctions this would be fast-track.

Four of the "Big Five" events unfolded on scales estimated at hundreds of thousands to millions of years, inflicted in the main by naturally-caused global warming or cooling.


The most abrupt extinction came at the end of the Cretaceous, some 65 million years ago when a comet or asteroid slammed into the Yucatan peninsula, in modern-day Mexico, causing firestorms whose dust cooled the planet.An estimated 76 percent of species were killed, including the dinosaurs.

The authors admitted to weaknesses in the study. They acknowledged that the fossil record is far from complete, that mammals provide an imperfect benchmark of Earth's biodiversity and further work is needed to confirm their suspicions.But they described their estimates as conservative and warned a large-scale extinction would have an impact on a timescale beyond human imagining.
"Recovery of biodiversity will not occur on any timeframe meaningful to people," said the study.

"Evolution of new species typically takes at least hundreds of thousands of years, and recovery from mass extinction episodes probably occurs on timescales encompassing millions of years."

Even so, they stressed, there is room for hope.




"So far, only one to two percent of all species have gone gone extinct in the groups we can look at clearly, so by those numbers, it looks like we are not far down the road to extinction. We still have a lot of Earth's biota to save," Barnosky said.Even so, "it's very important to devote resources and legislation toward species conservation if we don't want to be the species whose activity caused a mass extinction." Asked for an independent comment, French biologist Gilles Boeuf, president of the Museum of Natural History in Paris, said the question of a new extinction was first raised in 2002.


So far, scientists have identified 1.9 million species, and between 16,000 and 18,000 new ones, essentially microscopic, are documented each year."At this rate, it will take us a thousand years to record all of Earth's biodiversity, which is probably between 15 and 30 million species" said Boeuf.
"But at the rate things are going, by the end of this century, we may well have wiped out half of them, especially in tropical forests and coral reefs."

Until mankind's big expansion some 500 years ago, mammal extinctions were very rare: on average, just two species died out every million years. But in the last five centuries, at least 80 out of 5,570 mammal species have bitten the dust, providing a clear warning of the peril to biodiversity.



by "environment clean generations"

Life can emerge everywhere...



                     In fact we do not know the answer to this question, for a simple reason: we have available only one Earth to examine, so far. As far as we know regarding carbon-based life, we can roughly determine  where planets would be that there could be life as we know it. This will help our great looking, will help us not waste the efforts of searching in all corners of the universe

                             Condition number one

                     The first condition refers to mass of the star. The giant ones . . glowing beauty, but have a life too short (less than a billion years) to allow for life to arise and evolve.

  
At the other end, stars too young (with masses one tenth the mass of the Sun) just does not light up and so will not release into space enough energy for the emergence of life. We can say that our Sun is very close to a star capable of sustaining life on average. This is why our future research will go to the stars similar to ours.

                    Condition number two 


         We will still talk about mass, but this time on planet's mass. This parameter is related to life, a very important parameter. It's about atmospheric composition. A very massive planet would not let escape into space, light gases such as hydrogen. But it will combine with nitrogen, resulting in ammonia, or carbon, resulting methane, we would have an atmosphere similar to that of Jupiter, an atmosphere unfavorable to life.
                     The same thing about small planets. Could not harbor life. They will let hydrogen escape, which puts us problems if too massive planets, but in addition will escape into space oxygen and water vapor.
                     Thin atmospheres of small planets have another drawback: they can't protect against ultraviolet radiation and meteorites. Again, we can say that our blue planet is perfect for appearance and evolution of life

                             Condition number three

                       Distance from the star, is in turn, a critical parameter for life. As we know, life is based on liquid water. We therefore have restricted temperature range within which life is possible, hence the planet that is, required to be within a certain distance from its star. In our case, if Earth's orbit would change only slightly, then life would not exist. 
 
 
                             Condition number four  

                       The latter condition is related to the composition and structure of the planet. The composition of the planet in terms of content of chemical elements we'll not dwell, in this area is quite a large variations allowed, provided that there exist those ingredients necessary to life. But there is another important aspect: the internal structure of the planet. Fortunately, the Earth possesses a outer molten core, which allows generating a magnetic field intense enough to protect us from harmful radiation emitted by the sun. 

                       Here, we reviewed briefly as possible, the main conditions necessary for the appearance of life. You already found that, as we understand it now, life is something very fragile. Several conditions must be met simultaneously, which entitles us to say that life could be a rare phenomenon. This may seem to a skeptical view, an argument in favor of our loneliness in the universe. But there is another approach that can be summed up in one simple sentence. Whenever there are necessary conditions for the emergence of life, it appears necessary! 
  
 
           by "environment clean generations"

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Search

Custom Search

 
Design by Wordpress Theme | Bloggerized by Free Blogger Templates | coupon codes