Environment-Clean-Generations

Environment-Clean-Generations
THE DEFINITIVE BLOG FOR EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENT YOU LIVE IN, WITH REFERENCE TO LIFE, EARTH AND COSMIC SPACE SCIENCES, PRESENTED BY ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER DORU INDREI, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ENERGY SPACIALIST
"Life is not about what we know, but what we don't know, craving the unthinkable makes it so amazing, that is worth dying for." Doru Indrei
Custom Search
Showing posts with label star. Show all posts
Showing posts with label star. Show all posts

Galactic Danger Zone


 Not every place within a galaxy experiences the same conditions for habitability - some parts are lethal thanks to supernovae, whilst others do not possess enough heavy elements to allow rocky planets and life to develop. Credit: The Hubble Heritage Team, AURA/STScI/NASA

We know for certain that life exists in the Milky Way galaxy: that life is us. Scientists are continually looking to understand more about how life on our planet came to be and the conditions that must be met for its survival, and whether those conditions can be replicated elsewhere in the Universe. It turns out that looking at our entire Galaxy, rather than focusing just on life-giving properties of our planet or indeed the habitability of regions of our own Solar System, is a good place to start.  

How far our planet orbits from the , along with other factors such as , a and the existence of water, has told astronomers much about the conditions that are required for life to not only originate, but to survive on rocky worlds. 

This distance from a star is referred to, quite simply, as the ‘Habitable Zone’ or sometimes the ‘Goldilocks Zone’ because conditions here are neither too hot or too cold for water to be liquid on the planet’s surface -- conditions just right for life as we know it to thrive. 

Copernican theory tells us that our world is a typical rocky planet in a typical planetary system. This concept has spurred some astronomers to start thinking bigger, way beyond the simplicity of any one planetary system and instead towards much grander scales. Astronomers are exploring whether there is a Galactic Habitable Zone (GHZ) in our Galaxy – a region of the Milky Way that is conducive to forming planetary systems with habitable worlds. The Galactic Habitable Zone implies that if there are conditions just right for a planet around a star, then the same must go for a galaxy.  

This concept was first introduced by geologist and paleontologist Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee, an astronomer and astrobiologist, in their book, ‘Rare Earth’. The idea of a GHZ served as an antagonistic view point to the Copernican principle. 

Despite scientists such as Carl Sagan and Frank Drake favoring the theory of mediocrity based on the Copernican model, which supports the probability of the hosting other forms of , Ward and Brownlee were certain our Earth and the conditions within our Galaxy that allowed such life to evolve are both extremely rare. 

Their answer to the famous Fermi paradox – if extraterrestrial aliens are common, why is their existence not obvious? – is that alien life more complex than microbes is not very common at all, requiring a number of factors, each of low possibility, to come into play. In short, Ward and Brownlee were suggesting that much of the Galaxy was inhospitable to complex life. In their view, only a narrow belt around the Galaxy was fertile: the Galactic Habitable Zone.

Since then, many astronomers have looked at the idea of the GHZ. Not all believe that it necessarily supports Ward and Brownlee’s Rare Earth hypothesis.
One recent assessment of the GHZ, by Michael Gowanlock of NASA’s Astrobiology Institute, and his Trent University colleagues David Patton and Sabine McConnell, has suggested that while the inner sector of the may be the most dangerous, it is also most likely to support habitable worlds. 

Their paper, accepted for publication in the journal Astrobiology, modeled in the Milky Way based on three factors: supernova rates, metallicity (the abundance of heavy elements, used as a proxy for planet formation) and the time taken for complex life to evolve. They found that although the greater density of stars in the inner galaxy (out to a distance of 8,100 light years from the galactic center) meant that more supernovae exploded, with more planets becoming sterilized by the radiation from these exploding stars, the chances of finding a habitable planet there was ten times more likely than in the outer Galaxy. 

This contradicts previous studies that, for example, suggested the GHZ to be a belt around the Galaxy between distances of 22,800 light years (7 kiloparsecs) and 29,300 light years (9 kiloparsecs) from the galactic center. What’s noticeable is that our Sun orbits the Galaxy at a distance of about 26,000 light years (8 kiloparsecs) – far outside GHZ proposed by Gowanlock’s team. Why is their proposed galactic habitable zone so different? 

“We assume that metallicity scales with planet formation,” says Gowanlock. Heavy elements are produced by dying stars, and the more generations of stars there have been, the greater the production of these elements (or ‘metals’ as they are termed by astronomers). Historically, the greatest amount of star formation has occurred in the inner region of the Milky Way. “The inner Galaxy is the most metal-rich, and the outer Galaxy is the most metal-poor. Therefore the number of planets is highest in the inner Galaxy, as the metallicity and stellar density is the highest in this region.”  

    A supernova sterilizes an alien world in this artist's impression. Credit: David A Aguilar (CfA)

However, amongst so much star formation lurks a danger: supernovae. Gowanlock’s team modeled the effects of the two most common forms of supernovae – the accreting white dwarfs that produce type Ia supernovae, and the collapsing massive stars of type II supernovae. 

Measurements of the galactic abundance of the isotope aluminum-26, which is a common by-product of type II supernovae, have allowed astronomers to ascertain that a supernova explodes on average once every 50 years. Meanwhile, previous studies have indicated that a supernova can have a deleterious effect on any habitable planet within 30 light years. 

“In our model, we assume that the build-up of oxygen and the ozone layer is required for the emergence of complex life,” says Gowanlock. “Supernovae can deplete the ozone in an atmosphere. Therefore, the of land-based complex life is at risk when a nearby supernova sufficiently depletes a great fraction of the ozone in a planet's atmosphere.” 

The team discovered that at some time in their lives, the majority of stars in our Galaxy will be bathed in the radiation from a nearby supernova, whereas around 30% of stars remain untouched or unsterilized. “Sterilization occurs on a planet that is roughly [at a distance] between 6.5 to 98 , depending on the supernovae,” says Gowanlock. “In our model, the sterilization distances are not equal, as some supernovae are more lethal than others.” 

Although the outer regions of the Galaxy, with their lower density of stars and fewer supernovae, are generally safer, the higher metallicity in the inner Galaxy means that the chances of finding an unsterilized, habitable world are ten times greater, according to Gowanlock’s model. However, their model does not stipulate any region of the Galaxy to be uninhabitable, only that it’s less likely to find habitable planets elsewhere.
This explains why our Solar System can reside far outside of the inner region, and it also gives hope to SETI – Gowanlock’s model proposes that there are regions of the Galaxy even more likely to have life, and many SETI searches are already targeted towards the galactic center. 

However, not all are in favor of the new model. Ward and Brownlee noted that the Sun’s position in the Galaxy is far more favorable because planets that dance around stars that are too close to the galactic center are more likely to suffer from a perturbed orbit by the gravity of another star that has wandered too close. Others question some of the assumptions made in the research, such as the accuracy of the percentage of planets that are habitable in the galaxy (1.2 percent), or that tidally-locked worlds can be habitable.

 An artist's impression of a potentially habitable planet around a Sun-like star. The habitability of such worlds not only depends on conditions on the planet and its distance from the star, but may also depend on where in the Galaxy it is located. Credit: ESO/M Kornmesser

“The authors may be making some assumptions that aren’t too well justified,” says Professor Jim Kasting of Penn State University and author of How to Find a Habitable Planet. “They seem well ahead of the rest of us who are still pondering these questions.” 

However, others believe that the research is promising. “This is one of the most complete studies of the Galactic to date,” says Lewis Dartnell, an astrobiologist at University College London. “The results are intriguing, finding that white dwarf supernovae are over five times more lethal to complex life on habitable worlds than core collapse supernovae.” 

The GHZ isn’t static; the research paper written by Gowanlock’s team points out that over time the metallicity of the Galaxy will begin to increase the farther out one travels from the .
“This is why stars that form at a later date have a greater chance of having terrestrial planets,” says Gowanlock. As a result, perhaps the heyday for life in our Galaxy is yet to come.

by "environment clean generations"

A Distant Black Hole Devoured A Star



Positions from Swift's XRT constrained the source to a small patch of sky that contains a faint galaxy known to be 3.9 billion light-years away. But to link the Swift event to the galaxy required observations at radio wavelengths, which showed that the galaxy's center contained a brightening radio source. Analysis of that source using the Expanded Very Large Array and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) shows that it is still expanding at more than half the speed of light.


 Two studies appearing in the Aug. 25 issue of the journal Nature provide new insights into a cosmic accident that has been streaming X-rays toward Earth since late March. NASA's Swift satellite first alerted astronomers to intense and unusual high-energy flares from the new source in the constellation Draco.


"Incredibly, this source is still producing X-rays and may remain bright enough for Swift to observe into next year," said David Burrows, professor of astronomy at Penn State University and lead scientist for the mission's X-Ray Telescope instrument. "It behaves unlike anything we've seen before."


Astronomers soon realized the source, known as Swift J1644+57, was the result of a truly extraordinary event -- the awakening of a distant galaxy's dormant black hole as it shredded and consumed a star. The galaxy is so far away, it took the light from the event approximately 3.9 billion years to reach Earth.


Burrows' study included NASA scientists. It highlights the X- and gamma-ray observations from Swift and other detectors, including the Japan-led Monitor of All-sky X-ray Image (MAXI) instrument aboard the .


The second study was led by Ashley Zauderer, a post-doctoral fellow at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass. It examines the unprecedented outburst through observations from numerous ground-based radio observatories, including the National Radio Astronomy Observatory's Expanded (EVLA) near Socorro, N.M.

Most galaxies, including our own, possess a central supersized black hole weighing millions of times the sun's mass. According to the new studies, the black hole in the galaxy hosting Swift J1644+57 may be twice the mass of the four-million-solar-mass black hole in the center of the

As a star falls toward a black hole, it is ripped apart by intense tides. The gas is corralled into a disk that swirls around the black hole and becomes rapidly heated to temperatures of millions of degrees. 

 The innermost gas in the disk spirals toward the black hole, where rapid motion and magnetism create dual, oppositely directed "funnels" through which some particles may escape. Jets driving matter at velocities greater than 90 percent the speed of light form along the black hole's spin axis. In the case of Swift J1644+57, one of these jets happened to point straight at Earth.



Swift's X-Ray Telescope continues to record high-energy flares from Swift J1644+57 more than three months after the source's first appearance. Astronomers believe that this behavior represents the slow depletion of gas in an accretion disk around a supermassive black hole. The first flares from the source likely coincided with the disk's creation, thought to have occurred when a star wandering too close to the black hole was torn apart. 

"The radio emission occurs when the outgoing jet slams into the interstellar environment," Zauderer explained. "By contrast, the X-rays arise much closer to the black hole, likely near the base of the jet."

Theoretical studies of tidally disrupted stars suggested they would appear as flares at optical and ultraviolet energies. The brightness and energy of a black hole's jet is greatly enhanced when viewed head-on. The phenomenon, called relativistic beaming, explains why Swift J1644+57 was seen at X-ray energies and appeared so strikingly luminous.


When first detected March 28, the flares were initially assumed to signal a gamma-ray burst, one of the nearly daily short blasts of high-energy radiation often associated with the death of a massive star and the birth of a black hole in the distant universe. But as the emission continued to brighten and flare, astronomers realized that the most plausible explanation was the tidal disruption of a sun-like star seen as beamed emission.


By March 30, EVLA observations by Zauderer's team showed a brightening radio source centered on a faint galaxy near Swift's position for the X-ray flares. These data provided the first conclusive evidence that the galaxy, the radio source and the Swift event were linked.


Images from Swift's Ultraviolet/Optical (white, purple) and X-Ray telescopes (yellow and red) were combined to make this view of Swift J1644+57. Evidence of the flares is seen only in the X-ray image, which is a 3.4-hour exposure taken on March 28, 2011. 

"Our observations show that the radio-emitting region is still expanding at more than half the speed of light," said Edo Berger, an associate professor of astrophysics at Harvard and a coauthor of the radio paper. 

"By tracking this expansion backward in time, we can confirm that the outflow formed at the same time as the Swift X-ray source." Swift, launched in November 2004, is managed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. It is operated in collaboration with Penn State, the Los Alamos National Laboratory in N.M. and Orbital Sciences Corp., in Dulles, Va., with international collaborators in the U.K., Italy, Germany and Japan. MAXI is operated by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency as an external experiment attached to the Kibo module of the space station.




by "environment clean generations"

Life can emerge everywhere...



                     In fact we do not know the answer to this question, for a simple reason: we have available only one Earth to examine, so far. As far as we know regarding carbon-based life, we can roughly determine  where planets would be that there could be life as we know it. This will help our great looking, will help us not waste the efforts of searching in all corners of the universe

                             Condition number one

                     The first condition refers to mass of the star. The giant ones . . glowing beauty, but have a life too short (less than a billion years) to allow for life to arise and evolve.

  
At the other end, stars too young (with masses one tenth the mass of the Sun) just does not light up and so will not release into space enough energy for the emergence of life. We can say that our Sun is very close to a star capable of sustaining life on average. This is why our future research will go to the stars similar to ours.

                    Condition number two 


         We will still talk about mass, but this time on planet's mass. This parameter is related to life, a very important parameter. It's about atmospheric composition. A very massive planet would not let escape into space, light gases such as hydrogen. But it will combine with nitrogen, resulting in ammonia, or carbon, resulting methane, we would have an atmosphere similar to that of Jupiter, an atmosphere unfavorable to life.
                     The same thing about small planets. Could not harbor life. They will let hydrogen escape, which puts us problems if too massive planets, but in addition will escape into space oxygen and water vapor.
                     Thin atmospheres of small planets have another drawback: they can't protect against ultraviolet radiation and meteorites. Again, we can say that our blue planet is perfect for appearance and evolution of life

                             Condition number three

                       Distance from the star, is in turn, a critical parameter for life. As we know, life is based on liquid water. We therefore have restricted temperature range within which life is possible, hence the planet that is, required to be within a certain distance from its star. In our case, if Earth's orbit would change only slightly, then life would not exist. 
 
 
                             Condition number four  

                       The latter condition is related to the composition and structure of the planet. The composition of the planet in terms of content of chemical elements we'll not dwell, in this area is quite a large variations allowed, provided that there exist those ingredients necessary to life. But there is another important aspect: the internal structure of the planet. Fortunately, the Earth possesses a outer molten core, which allows generating a magnetic field intense enough to protect us from harmful radiation emitted by the sun. 

                       Here, we reviewed briefly as possible, the main conditions necessary for the appearance of life. You already found that, as we understand it now, life is something very fragile. Several conditions must be met simultaneously, which entitles us to say that life could be a rare phenomenon. This may seem to a skeptical view, an argument in favor of our loneliness in the universe. But there is another approach that can be summed up in one simple sentence. Whenever there are necessary conditions for the emergence of life, it appears necessary! 
  
 
           by "environment clean generations"

Life In The Universe



                             Suppose now that somewhere, far, far away, there is a planet that harbors life. Could we somehow detect it? Could we read in the newspapers over the coming decades titles like: "Alien life was discovered"? 
                 The most obvious way to discover alien life would be sending a spatial probe, collecting samples from the planet chosen by us. Unfortunately this has a blemish way. With our tehnology we can do expeditions only in our solar system. We have some chance to discover life-forms on Mars, Titan or Europa. Expeditions that are underway or in the final phase of preparations will bring answers over a while. Of course, we are likely to find life in other places in the Solar System  too, but increasing the chance of discovering intelligent life ,we gotta get used to the idea to look in other star systems, to find life in the universe.

                No matter how optimistic should we be, we can not hope that we will very soon create those technologies that will allow us to get out and beyond our solar system. It is certain that will be made ​​once, when we better understand the fabric of space and time. Until then we should look for some ways that will allow us from here, from Earth, to identify those planets where life evolved. 
It may seem surprising to many of you, but this search has already begun, by identifying the first extrasolar planets, to find life in the universe.
               This discovery allowed us to say that planetary systems are not rare events in the universe. Followed, in November 2001, announcing an epochal discovery: it was first discovered an extrasolar planet with atmosphere. It's planet HD 209458, the discovery was detailed in Science and Technology 1/2-2002. Moreover, a brief analysis could be made of the composition of the atmosphere. Could this kind of discovery help to identify distant life-planets? And life in the universe?

               Two important missions, one organized by NASA, with it's Kepler Space Telescope and the other by ESA, is about Darwin Space Telescope.The NASA spacecraft was launched on March 7, 2009 with a planned mission lifetime of at least 3.5 years, designed to discover Earth-like planets orbiting other stars. Here is a very important step in detection of extraterrestrial life



   
            First, the mere discovery of such a planet, to a right distance from the right star, could easily tell us the possibility that there life could be sheltered. But to science this is not enough. Evidence is needed. If there is life on a planet, the atmosphere should signal its presence. Even the air you exhale, the moment you read this article, gives us information on your presence. It contains more carbon dioxide than in the normal atmosphere. We know that someone is the room, by simply analyzing the air in the given room.
           We could tell if there are "creatures" by changes that are made in air composition inside. 

                We can also undertake research on a planetary scale, in the hope that we can find signs of life on a certain planet. But in such a situation, things are complicated. As a fact, the only possible form of life is based on liquid water and carbon. It is possible that this is a limitation of the scientific imagination (which, unlike other kinds of "imagination", needs a solid base).  

               We, scientists, have few limitations in this regard and therefore we can say that there might be other life-forms that have no connection with what we know so far.Life in the universe out there can be very bizarre.
               But we can not go too far, because we can not remove too much of what we know. We added this paragraph a statement that belongs to a scientist at NASA. David Des Marais is a researcher at Ames Research Center, said that "we must consider to what extent alien biology might be different from ours, especially when it comes to macromolecules." (This is why silicon-based life could be taken into account although, in this grouping, have made ​​strong arguments against it.)
               Let us return for a short while to the example that I gave earlier. Say that we can identify the presence of people in a room just by analyzing the composition of air inside. A supplement of CO2 would be sufficient and satisfactory proof. A similar path should follow when looking for signs of life in the universe on other planets. We depart from the assumption that living organisms possess a metabolism. Simplified speaking, they take certain substances from the environment and eliminate others. The utmost importance, is the presence of the oxygen. When referring to an extrasolar planet, will have to consider an entire atmosphere, not a small area of it. Therefore the oxygen would be the best indicator of life. It is a highly reactive element which quickly combines with existing chemical elements on the surface or in the planet's atmosphere. 


             Free oxygen can not survive long in the atmosphere of a planet, as long as it is not generated by a geological or biological process. The same thing we can say for terrestrial oxygen. It is the result of metabolic processes during photosynthesis, or, if you will, it is the result of "pollution" from the plants. Carl Sagan noted in 1997 that "high concentration of oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere could be very difficult to explain in the absence of life." 



               Here is the first criterion that could help to identify the existence of life in the universe on a distant planet, thousands of light years from Earth. Sure, now I have to tell you how to identify the oxygen in the atmosphere of a distant planet. Principle is not complicated and was already used to detect extrasolar planets with atmosphere, as was the case of HD 2094. 
              Practical we only have to follow the spectrum of the target star, seeking dark lines that are specific elements that absorb light of the star on certain frequencies. We make this observation for long periods, carefully watching the periodic appearance and disappearance of additional lines, it indicate a planet passing in front of the star disc. These lines indicates the presence of a planet periodically passing in front of the star.

   
             In the next stage will see whose elements correspond to absorption lines. If we identify the oxygen, we can move forward. We will make more precise measurements , we determine the mass and distance of the planet from the central star. If the values ​​obtained will overlap with those considered by us to be favorable for life, than we can announce the newspapers that (probably) we have discovered a planet that harbors life.
            Perhaps you don't like our eternal distressing uncertainty, our repeated lack of safety. So is science. Additional evidence is needed to confirm their initial ones.

            Where can we find them? If we can not go fast on the planet assumed to be a shelter for life, we call the same method indicated above. We will look more carefully in search of another gas that should not be there. The gas that we refer now is already an indication as to the existence of life on a celestial body, apparently close to our eyes, it's Mars.  


             Mars Express Probe has detected traces of methane in the Martian atmosphere, which could have indicate the existence of primitive life-forms on the Red Planet. Why would methane gas be an indicator for life? In fact it is not as chemically reactive as oxygen and, therefore, could survive long and hard in an atmosphere that was generated by the biochemical pathways. Methane is not very reactive. But methane has another interesting property for us: it is unstable. Its chemical bonds break easily under the action of cosmic radiation, so it will decompose quickly enough (for Mars let's say 400,000 years)
            To continue our demonstration about life in the universe, we will add that methane is an important metabolic product resulting from metabolism of certain bacteria that break down dead organisms .
That is why, the very moment we find, simultaneously, the atmosphere of extrasolar planets, both oxygen and methane, as we move from "very likely" to "almost certainly" when will communicate to world the news "life on another planet found". 
            Recent discoveries brought in full light a lot of planets that have atmosphere and even liquid water, but their distances ranging between 40 and 200 ly and even more, and right now this is a problem for us. 
           Furthermore, the future? The future is as exciting as it gets. It takes by surprising in a good way, especially when it comes to science. Life in the universe will eventually emerge. But the precise location, we can't tell yet. However, whenever the event will occur, we must prepare our minds to accept things that right now comes with the word "unimaginable"...





            by "environment clean generations"

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Search

Custom Search

 
Design by Wordpress Theme | Bloggerized by Free Blogger Templates | coupon codes